Several comments on my Yale e360 piece on alt fuels policy take the common view that biofuels are "essentially carbon neutral" and "inherently sustainable," as Mr. Lloyd puts it. However, nothing is inherently sustainable, and the carbon balance of any system is something that must be verified. My piece asks "Where's the climate benefit?" and for biofuels at market scale, it is not possible to answer to that question in an verifiable manner.
Simply substituting biomass carbon for fossil carbon does not suffice to ensure a net CO2 reduction, as shown by the example my article gives for corn ethanol. It may leave more fossil carbon in the ground, but that doesn't mean less carbon overall went into the air. A formal analysis of this issue is given in my new paper on "Biofuels Carbon Balance."
Examining ways to mitigate carbon emissions from automobiles and other forms of transportation.
Monday, September 30, 2013
Saturday, September 21, 2013
This blog was first put up today but as noted in the About page, it is also being used to archive earlier material. Hence the pre-dated posts that follow below.
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)